It’s time for the brand-new benchmark that is mega the Radeon RX 7900 XTX head to head with the GeForce RTX 4080 in a myriad of games. In total we have tested 54 titles, though some of those were tested using configurations that are multipleDX11 vs DX12, ray tracing, and so on) getting back together 62 online game examinations.
For examination we have our fingers in the massive Gigabyte Aorus RTX 4080 Master — we think this is basically the biggest illustrations card in the marketplace at this time. Currently selling for at the very least $1,350, which is over 12% above MSRP or around a $150 advanced, but because of the dimensions and body weight it type of is like you are at the very least getting that difference between the cooler.
For contrast we now have the* that is( 7900 XTX Elite which isn’t a “Master” version as it’s unavailable on the Radeon side, but even so the Aorus Elite is still a beast and we’re sure many would argue this is also a more practical graphics card in terms of dimensions and weight. Pricing for this model is a little unclear as it’s yet to go on sale, but if we had to guess we’d say $1,100 will be the price that is asking that one.
Our test system had been running on the* that is( 7 5800X3D with 32GB of dual-rank, dual-channel DDR4-3200 CL14 memory on the MSI MPG X570S Carbon Max Wi-Fi motherboard. As usual we plan to go over the data for a dozen or so titles before jumping into the breakdown that is big. We’re centering our attention into 1440p and 4K overall performance while you would anticipated, therefore let us go into it…
Benchmarks
We’re beginning with Fortnite which includes already been updated to utilize Unreal Engine 5.1, and it is the initial online game to take action. Here we are utilizing DX11 with the* that is( quality preset and we do realize anyone playing this game competitively will be using different quality settings, possibly a mix of Epic and Low quality options, but for the sake of testing GPU performance we’re using Epic here.
In Our test that is DX11 the 4080 had been 15% quicker at 1440p and 12% quicker at 4K. The Radeon GPU delivered somewhat much better 1% lows though, which can be interesting as that has beenn’t the way it is when it comes to past create of this online game.
Where things have messy is whenever we introduce DX12, which can be needed if you want to make use of the brand-new Unreal Engine 5.1 technologies. The problem is DX12 breaks Fortnite, it constantly has actually, and also this is apparent in quickly paced develop fights where this examination had been conducted.
The RTX 4080 saw almost a 50% decrease in framework prices at 1440p in comparison to DX11 utilising the quality that is same. We’re also looking at a 40% hit for the 7900 XTX, simply by switching from DX11 to DX12, and that’s got to be bad for ray tracing, which will have a further influence that is negative the framework rate.
The major reason for making use of DX12 is the fact that you can enable* that is( and Nanite technology which does look amazing. But neither technology is well suited to a game like Fortnite it harder to spot enemies and therefore survive the round.(* as it makes) framework prices are horribly reduced, particularly at 4K.
The degree people has a time that is hard less skilled players when limited to just 45 fps, which is why competitive gamers target well over 140 fps.High interesting here is that ray performance that is tracing
What’s, which can be one of the better examples of RT results in just about any online game at this time, views the 7900 XTX and RTX 4080 neck-and-neck. Fortnite reality, the* that is( GPU actually does a better job here with RT Radeon and Lumen enabled, and that’s a surprising result.Nanite of
Call: Duty II is another competitive shooter and for this testing we’re just using the built-in multiplayer benchmark, as it’s useful for measuring GPU performance, but not so much CPU performance. Modern Warfare be looking at performance using both the ‘We’ll’ and ‘Basic’ quality presets.Ultra 1440p with the basic settings we see that the 7900 XTX is 42% faster than the 4080, and 35% faster at 4K — a beat that is brutal by the
At GPU. Radeon will be the type of outcomes we have started to anticipate from These II and Modern Warfare II where AMD GPUs tend to be greatly favored.Warzone margins stayed the exact same with ‘
The’ options, where 7900 XTX had been 40% quicker at 1440p and 34% quicker at 4K. Ultra tend to be impressive gains and both are extremely apparent whenever video gaming, particularly at 4K, though competitive gamers will definitely value and relish the uplift that is massive 1440p.Both 3 we also tested different APIs, starting with the DX11 data we found that the game ran exceptionally well using either GPU, with the ultra quality settings allowing for over 250 fps at 1440p and over 100 fps at 4K.
In The Witcher amazing great experience, no frame stutters and zero issues.An To DX12, the game mostly ran well, though some crashes were experienced by us.
Moving overall was down when compared to DX11.Performance, DX12 does permit you to allow ray tracing and with the* that is( RT preset enabled… the game ran like crap. Ultra it looked nice, but we went from over 200 frames that are smooth 2nd at 1440p, to under 100 fps.Sure RTX 4080 played sensibly really with 66 fps an average of and 1% lows of 48 fps, it absolutely wasn’t amazing, and definitely not a $1,200 knowledge, nonetheless it had been playable.
The 7900 XTX, having said that, had been a stuttery mess, totally unplayable as well as a experience that is bad. The sucked at 4K, so you will need to use upscaling here.Both has long been hailed as a great showcase for ray tracing, and we weren’t convinced that the performance is hit on previous generation hardware made it all feasible for actual play.(* while we think the RT effects are nice on this game,) we are operating the conventional type of the overall game without RT allowed, while the overall performance is amazing, both GPUs rendered over 270 fps at 1440p and over 150 fps at 4K, both had been buttery smooth, the video game seemed great and played really, therefore a experience that is great round.
Metro Exodus here’s the* that is( variation with ray tracing allowed so we’ve got to state the 1440p answers are rather great.
Now, the performance hit is huge, however these brand-new GPUs that is high-end still over 60 fps at 1440p. Enhanced Edition 4K you will want to use some kind of upscaling, especially with the 7900 XTX, but overall the results are quite good.Yes this is an RTX title, the GeForce 4080 has a advantage that is massive RT allowed, pumping away 42% more frames at 1440p and 51percent more at 4K, a difference from what had been present in
Because utilizing RT For and Fortnite.Lumen standard we test F1 22 with ray tracing allowed since this could be the standard environment for the Nanite preset.
By 7900 XTX executes really, nevertheless the RTX 4080 does do much better, delivering 12% much better overall performance at 1440p and 14percent more at 4K.Ultra High our viewpoint though, ray tracing does little to boost picture high quality in F1 22, and a lot of gamers would be best switching it well. The therefore gets better the overall performance of this RTX 4080 at 4K by 232per cent then 302% when it comes to 7900 XTX.
In you are delighted playing the overall game at 4K with ~60 fps, then perhaps RT should be well worth allowing, but we believe for some of you the performance struck right here just cannot be warranted if real the 7900 XTX could be the performer that is superior this title.Doing using the quality that is ultra configurations offered little challenge of these brand-new high-end GPUs, both effortlessly forced past 300 fps at 1440p and over 170 fps at 4K, which can be far more overall performance than anybody has to play this video game well.
If Being the full case the game is worth playing with ray tracing enabled as performance for both GPUs is still excellent, and shadow detail in particular is much more impressive.
Playing The Riftbreaker the 7900 XTX produced over 200 fps at 1440p and over 100 fps at 4K, so even though the RTX 4080 was 16% faster, both delivered a experience that is similar
That we now have Even 40,000:
Next with the Warhammer and also this one seems really enhanced both for AMD and Darktide GPUs since the 7900 XTX and RTX 4080 delivered performance that is virtually identical. Autodesk Stingray Engine the quality that is high we are examining easily over 100 fps an average of at 1440p and 60 fps at 4K.Nvidia A Using:
For we utilized the quality preset that is highest, where the 7900 XTX outperformed the RTX 4080 to the tune of 21% at 1440p and 10% at 4K. A win that is clear the Plague Tale GPU, though both illustrations cards delivered exemplary overall performance because of the aesthetic high quality options.Requiem is yet another brand-new online game where 7900 XTX has the capacity to ideal the RTX 4080, winning by 8% at 1440p and 3% at 4K.Radeon said, oahu is the considerably much better 1% reduced overall performance than actually receives the
The Callisto Protocol GPU within the range right here, increasing 1% lows at 1440p by 20% and 11% at 4K.
That, Radeon GPUs have carried out really in
Traditionally Z Radeon, including the 6900 XT accustomed comfortably defeat the 12GB 3080. World War this generation, the* that is( 7900 XTX matches the RTX 4080 at 4K but is able to beat it by a small margin at 1440p.In taken a more detailed look at just a handful of the 54 games we tested, let’s now compare the GeRadeonce RTX 4080 and
Performance Summary
We’ve RX 7900 XT across all the games we’ve spent the past few weeks benchmarking, and we’ll start with the 1440p data…For we have data for all 62 test configurations, squeezed into a single graph, showing us that on average the Radeon 7900 XTX is a match for the Ge
Herece RTX 4080 across this massive sample of games. Radeon course, we have a number of ray tracing enabled results here, this is everything we tested for this review that is benchmarkFor 4K, the total results are equally close but now the Of 7900 XTX is 1% faster than the RTX 4080 on average, but to put it more succinctly, performance was identical overall with some outliers making a difference if you happen to play those game a lot.
At 7900 XTX suffers its worst losses in Radeon EE and* that is( 3 utilizing RT. Metro Exodus, it liked its biggest victory in The Witcher 2, along with other solid victories in Meanwhile 3, Modern Warfare, Borderlands 6 and Death Stranding.Far Cry worth noting that for 42 of this 62 online game designs tested right here, or ~70% for the online game examinations, we are examining single-digit differences when considering these GPUs.Assassin’s Creed Valhalla &
It’s it comes down to thermals, the outcome vary with respect to the illustrations card make and model utilized, but also for this contrast we’d
Cooling 7900 XTX and RTX 4080. Power
When nonetheless desired to provide you with a research part of our test that has been calculated once the cards had been put in in a ATX instance because of the doorways shut as well as an room that is ambient of 21C.Gigabyte Aorus an hour of playing We 3, the
After RTX 4080 saw a peak hot spot temperature of 77C with a peak average GPU temperature of 63C. Hitman memory also peaked at 58C and to enable these temperatures the fans spun at 1930 RPM and generated 38 dBA of noise. Aorus Master, the cores typically clocked at 2745 MHz with the memory running at 22.4 The, a result that is good.Meanwhile 7900 XTX had been a extremely customer that is cool in similar conditions it peaked at just 72C for the hot spot with an average GPU temperature of just 58C. Gbps VRM temp 75C and it was the memory that ran the hottest of all, hitting 90C, which is significantly hotter than the memory used by the RTX 4080, though we are comparing GDDR6 vs GDDR6X.
The Gigabyte Aorus Elite 7900 XTX was also quieter at 37 dBA and that’s a result that is surprising that the full total system energy consumption had been greater making use of the The GPU at 555 watts in comparison to simply 465 watts because of the RTX 4080.
The Aorus Elite, the 7900 XTX usually clocked its cores at 2690 MHz, although the memory operated at 19.9 Radeon.Finally we evaluated the GeGbpsce RTX 4080 back in
Key Takeaways
When we had beenn’t also impressed from the price point of view. For-wise the 4080 is very good, but at $1,200 it did not stimulate us, so we figured we would need certainly to wait for 7900 XTX prior to making any calls that are concreteNovember came mid-Performance and we finally got to see what the
Then 7900 XTX was all about. December, AMD has a high-performance that is competitive relative to its GeRadeonce competitor, but whether or perhaps not it is well worth purchasing at $1,000 is determined by simply how much stock you spot in ray tracing overall performance.Overall 7900 XTX does really in matching the RTX 4080 with regards to of performance/value, that’s perhaps not up for discussion, but we nonetheless have the 4080 signifies value that is poor gamers in the first place, so here we are with a For alternative to a product we’re none too excited about.
The Radeon Been thinking a complete good deal concerning the 7900 XTX, and just why we have discovered it therefore underwhelming. Radeon we believe back again to the
We’ve 5700 XT, a 2019 GPU that people quite definitely liked and considered value that is excellent the margins are somewhat similar to this generation. If 5700 XT was 20% cheaper than the RTX 2070 Radeon, or a $100 saving and it offered a level that is similar of. The, the brand new 7900 XTX is 16% less expensive than the RTX 4080 and provides an equivalent amount of overall performance while helping you save $200.Super scenario with the* that is( 7900 XTX is different though.
The, the 2070 Radeon was a product that is decent it killed off the First VII for video gaming, and it also had been well worth promoting at $500 — really supplying the thing that was formerly $800 overall performance because of the RTX 2080. Super for the 5700 XT in the future in and gives an equivalent amount of overall performance but in the reduced $400 price, really, that has been rather impressive.Radeon, the RTX make of functions was not almost as powerful three years ago, DLSS help and picture high quality was not exactly what it really is these days, and extremely few games implemented RT effects well, so neither technology had been a selling that is strong for GeSoce GPUs, making the cheaper 5700 XT all the more appealing.
Moreover 7900 XTX is competing with a far worse value product in the RTX 4080, and while the For GPU is cheaper, it’s also generally inferior when it comes to ray performance that is tracing it nonetheless does not have a genuine upscaling rival to your commonly supported DLSS, it sucks straight down rather a little more energy and motorist help actually as adult with some odd niggles right here and truth be told there.
The, we would say worst-case, the 7900 XTX fits the worthiness of this RTX 4080, and a lot of of you are feeling you would buy it within the GeRadeonce GPU, at the very least predicated on information coming from a poll that is recent carried out.
Still also think moving forward ray tracing performance might be less of an issue, at least if what we’re seeing in For is anything to go by.
We, there will always be RTX titles sponsored by Fortnite where Sure GPUs get slaughtered, that’s just how the game seems to be played, but overall we think AMD’s ray tracing performance is now in more ground that is solid before.Nvidia the termination of a single day, we do not believe you ought to venture out and get either of those GPUs at their particular $1,000 – $1,200 MSRPs, nonetheless it does appear to be numerous gamers have an interest and happy to spend the the inexpensive 7900 XTX in this price that is particular, which seems reasonable but we’d be a lot happier if we see a price drop in the near future.Radeon going to do it for this massive benchmark comparison, into it, feel free to share, like and subscribe.
That’s:(* if you enjoyed this feature and appreciate the work that went)
