AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT Review

The Radeon RX 7900 XT may be the RDNA that is second 3 released thus far, and no, you didn’t just read this review days ago, this is the XT version, not the XTX. It’s not a naming that is good from AMD, with sufficient figures offered they undoubtedly may have prevented having two services and products with very nearly identical brands.

The 7900 XT is actually a decrease form of the 7900 XTX. Instead of 48 workgroup processors we have 42, for the total of 84 compute devices — nonetheless a rise from the RDNA2 that is top model this leads to 10,752 shader units. Clock speeds are also a little lower, at a game clock of 2 GHz with a board that is total score of 300W.

Bus width is slashed to 320 little bit, but we get yourself a healthier 20 GB from it. In terms of core and memory setup the 7900 XT ultimately ends up about 85% compared to the leading design, a much smaller gap than Nvidia offers involving the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080, the latter of that is such as a 60 to 70 % form of the flagship.

However, deciding on we had beenn’t amazed because of the 7900 XTX, will there be any a cure for the XT that is attempting to sell just for $100 less? Not actually. For a 10% preserving, the memory capability, cache and data transfer have got all already been paid off by 17per cent, and surprise, shock it’s 17% slower at 4K, so that the cost per framework is actually more serious.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is really a item AMD does not want to sell really, considering they suggested that they won’t have that many defective 300 mm2 GCD. As noted in the 7900 XTX review, the XT version uses the die that is same however with one less MCD, 5 in place of 6. This suggests any GCD that can’t be offered being an XTX gets binned being an XT model.

In truth, the 7900 XT will probably be a design that moves in reasonable amounts and also this might be because of the fact that AMD has actually silicon that is little defective they need to flog off. But if that isn’t the case, you can expect the 7900 XT to drop in price sooner than expected which could actually benefit its prospects.

For testing all GPUs we have used the clock that is official without any factory overclocking. The Central Processing Unit utilized is the* that is( 7 5800X3D with 32GB of dual-rank, dual-channel DDR4-3200 CL14 memory on the MSI MPG X570S Carbon Max Wi-Fi motherboard. In total we tested 16 games at 1440p and 4K.

Benchmarks

Starting with The Callisto Protocol, we see that at 1440p the 7900 XT is 11% slower than the XTX and just 5% slower than the RTX 4080. It’s also 35% faster than the 6900 XT, a 2 year GPU that is old that at $1,000.

The 4K margins are a lot equivalent, the 7900 XT had been 14% slow as compared to XTX, though this right time 11% slower than the RTX 4080. The margin over the 6900 XT also shrank to 28%.

Next up we have Forza Horizon 5 where the 7900 XT was just 9% slower than the XTX. We still suspect there is some driver related issue in this game as RDNA 3 performance in general is weak relative to what we see in other titles. For example, the 7900 XT was a mere 5% faster than the 6900 XT and slower than the 6950 XT which is unusual.

The 4K results are mildly improved, here the Radeon 7900 XT was 12% slower than the XTX, and rather than trail the 6950 XT, it’s 2% faster, so yay.

Moving on to Rainbow Six Extraction, we see that the 7900 XT is good for 238 fps on average, making it 15% slower than the 7900 XTX and 17% slower than the RTX 4080, while it was 28% faster than the old 6900 XT.

Then at 4K, the frame rate drops to 119 fps, making the 7900 XT 17% slower than the XTX version and 25% slower than the RTX 4080. It was also just 5% faster than the RTX 3090, but 35% faster than the 6900 XT.

The Hunt: Showdown performance overall is very impressive with over 200 fps, but relative to competing parts, and generation that is previous, it really is absolutely nothing special.

We’re viewing a 18% shortage into the 7900 XTX, whilst it had been 22% quicker as compared to 6900 XT, the two 12 months GPU that is old it effectively replacing. Well, the XTX does that, but with pricing so similar you could say they both do.

At 4K the 7900 XT fell well behind the XTX, tailing it by a 20% margin, allowing it to only roughly match the RTX 3090, while it was just 15% faster than the 6900 XT, so overall quite a result that is disappointing

Like All Call GPUs, the 7900 XT does its work that is best in Duty of Modern Warfare, pumping out 269 fps in That II.

Even made it 14% slower than the 7900 XTX, but an impressive 23% faster than the RTX 4080 and 40% faster than the 6900 XT. A result that is great though once we based in the XTX analysis, these email address details are outliers.It at 4K the 7900 XT had been impressive with 163 fps an average of, which makes it 16% slow as compared to XTX design, but 14% quicker as compared to RTX 4080.

The has also been 35% quicker as compared to 6900 XT, which is really a good improvement that is generationalUltra High F1 22 results look disappointing as this game enables ray tracing by default when using the* that is( high quality preset, even though RDNA 3 makes great advances in this respect, it really is nonetheless at the very least a generation behind

As in terms of RT overall performance.Ti an effect, the 7900 XT was just in a position to match the 3080 Ti and 3090, which makes it 11% slow as compared to 3090

Even and 15% slow as compared to 7900 XTX.Ti at 4K the margins tend to be comparable, because of the 7900 XT fundamentally in a position to match the 3080 Ti and 3090, which makes it 13% slow as compared to 3090

The Cyberpunk. A really result that is disappointing’s a result of having RT effects enabled.As 2077 results are far more impressive when we don’t have RT effects enabled, we’re only using the quality preset that is high.

Then an effect the 7900 XT had been great for 118 fps an average of which makes it only 13% slow as compared to XTX as well as a simple 8% slow as compared to RTX 4080.The at 4K we’re viewing about 60 fps with no aid of upscaling, to make certain that’s very good. But 7900 XT was 16% slow compared to the XTX though, therefore offered it really is just 10% cheaper that isn’t great.

As in comparison to the old 6900 XT we’re viewing a 31% overall performance uplift.Radeon we present the* that is( 7900 XTX review, these new RDNA 3 GPUs don’t perform particularly well in

The 2, especially relative to previous-gen parts.

Things 7900 XT was just 8% faster than the 6900 XT at 1440p in this game at 1440p.Ti are worse at 4K, where the 7900 XT was 6% faster than the 6900 XT, matching the 3090

The with 66 fps, though it was just 15% slower than the RTX 4080, so when compared to generation that is current the outcomes do look much better.Halo Infinite final online game we will look individually is At, prior to taking a glance at the 16 online game data that are average. Radeon 1440p, the* that is( 7900 XT paired the GeTice 3090

Then which makes it only 12% quicker as compared to 6900 XT.

at 4K we’re viewing 82 fps an average of, which suggested the 7900 XT had been 15% slow as compared to 7900 XTX and 20% slow as compared to RTX 4080.Game Average

Here’s16 It’s a glance at the 16 game data that are average 1440p, previously we found the 7900 XTX and RTX 4080 to be neck and neck, the 7900 XT though is 13% slower on average, which isn’t amazing given it’s only 10% cheaper.

The also just 9% faster than previous generation flagship parts, which seems good for $900, but given today’s prices it’s not amazing.As 4K data is even worse as all other system limitations are basically removed, giving the GPUs that is high-end a more respiration room.

When an effect the 7900 XT is an average of 17% slow as compared to XTX variation.

For when compared with practical generation that is previous such as the 6800 XT it was 34% faster and while that might sound like a lot, remember the 6800 XT was released 2 years ago at $650, making the 7900 XT MSRP 38% higher, and worse the 6800 XT has been selling below MSRP for most of the year.

Ray Tracing those of you interested here’s the data that are 1080p fundamentally if you should be playing at reduced resolutions or with reduced high quality options these brand new high-end GPUs are not great when it comes to worth as framework price overall performance is practically constantly Central Processing Unit restricted.Upscaling Performance

There + Whereas are not any unexpected situations for ray tracing overall performance while the 7900 XT machines not surprisingly in accordance with the XTX design. Radeon the

The Watch Dogs 7900 XT had been 15% slow in F1 22 utilising the extremely preset that is high does enable RT effects, using FSR to upscale saw a very similar 14% margin between the XT and XTX.Legion:

Marvel’s Guardians results are also as expected, with RT disabled we are CPU limited at 1440p, so the XT was just 4% slower than the XTX, but with RT enabled it was 13% slower, which is what we typically see.Galaxy of the So saw the 7900 XT trail the XTX by an 11% margin with ray tracing enabled plus upscaling, and then 13% at the native resolution with ray tracing enabled. Ti 84 fps on average made it 25% faster than the 6950 XT, but 24% slower than the 3090

Here.So we see when using FSR 2 with ray tracing enabled the 7900 XT was 18% slower than the XTX and then 15% slower with upscaling disabled.

Finally again these are the margins you’d expect to see given the specifications.Cyberpunk, Ti 2077 ray performance that is racing 1440p utilising the extremely results the 7900 XT had been great for only 35 fps an average of or 59 fps with FSR enabled, which makes it 13% slow as compared to XTX design as well as a huge 29% slow as compared to RTX 3090

Power Consumption

On.

In report the 7900 XT is intended to take 55 watts not as much as the XTX and we also’re witnessing figures which can be pretty near to that level within our complete system evaluation.Radeon quick, the* that is( 7900 XT lowered total system usage by 48 to 53 watts in our testing when compared to the XTX model. Of around a 9-12% reduction in total system usage for 13-17% less performance.

With course, it would be more like a 15% reduction, but still nothing amazing.Frame

Although the frame rate locked at 90 fps in Radeon 2077 we see that the 7900 XT drops total system consumption by 4% when compared to the XTX model, so there is some power saving to be had with few active cores and one less MCD, even at the same performance target.(* if we were to just look at GPU power usage) Per For the flagship But 7900 XTX does represent the cost that is best per frame ratio of any GPU released in the last two years, the marginally more affordable 7900 XT doesn’t.In looking at a rather large 8% increase in cost per frame for the XT, making it in terms of value inferior to a number of previous generation high-end products, such as the 6800 XT.

The also only a 13% discount from the RTX 4080, which isn’t enough given how much more well rounded the*)ce that is ge is. Nvidia needless to say, the issue that is real the 7900 XT is the XTX, at just $100 more there is simply no reason to purchase this.

Cooling

Here’s our opinion, you’d buy the 7900 XTX every time.Installed 7900 XT is less impressive when looking at current market prices, too, basically slotting in alongside the 6900 XT and 6950 XT in terms of value, costing a little more for a little more performance, so RDNA 3 is hardly retiring RDNA 2. Radeon no need to draw a comparison with competing* that is( services and products since the 7900 XT makes no feeling at $900 when you’re able to choose the 7900 XTX for $1,000.Gbps A look that is quick thermal and clock behavior of the AMD reference model. Gbps inside an ATX case in a room that is 21c Overall RX 7900 XT peaked in a hot-spot temperature of 77c after one hour of game play by way of a maximum average perish heat of 65c, and also this had been attained by way of a lover rate of 1750 RPM.

What We Learned

In typical running clock frequency had been 2055 MHz and also the memory operated at 19.9 Radeon, only timid associated with the advertised 20 For.

Short the research card went cool and reasonably peaceful.For our viewpoint, there isn’t any explanation to get the* that is( RX 7900 XT, you’d always just spend $100 extra to get the faster 7900 XTX.

It’s the XT model to make sense it needs to cost $200 less than the XTX, anything short of that and you might as well buy the fully fledged model.

With of a GeForce competitor like the RTX 4070 that could shake things up (doubtfully from a pricing perspective), the new 7900 XT would have been something we could recommend at $800. a somewhat weird situation where the $900 option is not great value you might as well dig deep for another $200 and get the RTX 4080 for that DLSS support, NVENC, and superior ray tracing performance.(* that you are better off spending $1,000, but if you’re going to spend such a massive sum of money,) the GeRadeonce RTX 4080 at $1,200 (which we

Thedon’tRadeon suggest one to purchase), the* that is( 7900 XTX would be far more attractive at around $900, and the XT version selling for no more than $750.Ada Lovelace only advantage of the* that is( 7900 XT more than a component such as the RTX 4080 may be the VRAM capability, though the 16GB associated with the Ge

Shopping Shortcutsce GPU is much more than sufficient and then we believe should be for quite a while in the future, but needless to say, this can make a difference more for contrast with lower-end