Facepalm: Tech giants dishonest on benchmarks is one thing we have seen loads of instances. Samsung has allegedly achieved it with their telephones twice previously and has now been accused of doing it once more; on this event, it is the corporate’s TVs on the middle of the controversy.
YouTube channel HDTVTest was the primary to spotlight a possible dishonest difficulty in Samsung’s S95B QD-OLED TV. It seems this wasn’t an remoted incident as FlatpanelsHD discovered the identical discrepancy on the Samsung QN95B Neo QLED LCD TV.
The downside boils all the way down to the acquainted accusation of Samsung utilizing an algorithm to detect when benchmarking software program was working and adjusting its TVs accordingly. In this case, the colours had been modified to make them extra correct, and the luminance was boosted by an enormous 80%. According to FlatpanelsHD, the Neo QLED TV would not be capable of maintain this brightness degree with out damaging the backlight panel. The final objective of this kind of factor is to make the televisions look higher within the critiques than they are surely.
Samsung apparently took benefit of industry-standard benchmarking instruments to allow its dishonest. The software program exams HDR TVs by analyzing 10% of the display. When FlatpanelsHD modified this measurement to 9%, it was in a position to evade the alleged algorithm and get an correct studying.
Samsung Electronics informed The Register that it “doesn’t use any algorithm for the aim of yielding particular take a look at outcomes.” It added that its personal impartial third-party exams “present that HDR content material is precisely displayed on varied window sizes, and never simply at 10%,” and that related peak brightness ranges will be maintained throughout window sizes with out damaging the panel.
Contradicting that message considerably was Samsung South Korea’s assertion to FlatpanelsHD. It promised to “present a software program replace that ensures constant brightness of HDR contents throughout a wider vary of window measurement past the {industry} normal.”
Samsung was accused of dishonest with the Galaxy Note 3 cellphone benchmarks in 2013 and did the identical with the Galaxy S4. The latter led to a class-action lawsuit that it settled for $13.4 million, or round $10 per proprietor, in 2019.
Samsung is not the one one participating in these kind of shenanigans. Many corporations, particularly Android gadget makers equivalent to OnePlus and HTC, have been accused of benchmark dishonest. Both MediaTek and Huawei disregarded the follow after they had been caught by saying everybody does it.
