Madison Square Garden makes use of facial recognition against appropriate adversary
A hot potato: Facial recognition mainly consumes a protection part, but one business has actually tried it against a adversary that is legal. The incident could provide fuel for privacy advocates who have long criticized the technology out of concern for how organizations might employ it.
Madison Square Garden (MSG) Entertainment prevented a lawyer from attending a show with her daughter because she works for a firm currently suing one of its subsidiaries. The episode stoked controversy because the company identified the mother using recognition that is facial
When Kelly Conlon accompanied her girl on a* that is( field trip to Radio City Music Hall in New York City over Thanksgiving weekend, security forced her to wait outside while the Girl Scouts and the other parents watched the Christmas Spectacular show. Radio City Music Hall owner MSG Entertainment used recognition that is facial identify Conlon as an associate at work with Davis, Saperstein & Solomon – a New Jersey law practice battling an accident instance against a restaurant MSG owns.
Conlon is not active in the match – she does not exercise legislation in New York City – but MSG Entertainment prohibited everybody else attached to the company from going to activities at its properties. Music hallway protection labeled as her within the loudspeaker when she had the steel sensor. Shockingly, place staff knew Conlon’s title and career herself.(* before she could identify) company claims to have notified all
The lawyers of its rules more than once, but a partner with the firm called the policy punishment that is collective. Davis firms previously sued MSG Other within the rehearse, and* that is( believed Conlon would grant her entry because of a judge’s order in one of those recent cases.Radio City Music Hall is using the incident to challenge the company’s state liquor license, which requires it to admit members of the public barring security risks.
Davis facial recognition is mainly advertised for identifying potential security risks, Although said she posed none.Conlon other groups have faced legal and other pushback over facial recognition this year.
Multiple, the IRS stepped back from facial recognition to appease privacy advocates. In February began payouts to Facebook residents in Illinois due to a 2015 lawsuit alleging the company stored users’ facial scans without permission. May the same time, the UK’s Around fined Information Commissioner’s Office millions and ordered it to purge its facial recognition database them.(* after it collected UK citizens’ biometric data without properly informing)