We prefer to continue up to now with all the most recent in the wonderful world of upscaling, then when FSR 2.2 ended up being triggered as an element of AMD’s RDNA 3 notices, we believed it had been well worth having a look and view exactly how it even compares to the newest form of DLSS.
The very first game to guide FSR 2.2 is Forza Horizon 5 and though the launch is light on details, the main element claim is enhanced temporal upscaling high quality with extra improvements in accordance with FSR 2.1. The big point that is talking that AMD claims it “alleviates ghosting on fast moving objects,” which is critical for racing games like Forza Horizon, where you’ll be in motion pretty much all of the time — often very fast motion with large differences between each frame.
First, A word that is quick our bodies setup and assessment records. We’re utilizing a* that is( 9 7950X test rig equipped with 32GB of DDR5-6000 memory, the MSI MEG X670E Carbon motherboard, built inside the Corsair 5000D. To compare FSR 2.2 with DLSS we have to use an Nvidia GPU to gain access to all applicable technologies, so in this instance we’ve chosen to use the Ge( that is beefy*)ce 4080.
The Focus today will be 4K testing with a brief look at 1440p, which is where we feel upscaling makes the sense that is most. For the various videos we embed below (from Hardware Unboxed, of course) we highly recommend watching them at 4K, so you can see the highest quality version of the comparisons. Also, Forza Horizon 5 comes with DLSS 2.4.12, which was the most recent version when the update integrating DLSS was released.
Forza Horizon 5 Benchmark
We’ll start with a look at the built-in benchmark, which runs through a city race, comparing the native TAA implementation, DLSS 2.4 Quality and FSR 2.2 Quality, all default sharpening that is using. The thing that has been most straight that is noticeable is that the DLSS image is the sharpest and we’d actually say it’s a tad oversharpened using the default setting of 0.5.
For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:
All upscaling modes and even the TAA implementation support user adjustable sharpening, but while we used sharpness of 0.5 for all modes, clearly the DLSS implementation uses stronger sharpening for each notch on the slider. This slight oversharpness isn’t a big issue though, as you can tune this easily.
Right at the start of this benchmark pass, we can see a factor that is differentiating DLSS and FSR. Underneath the Horizon Apex indication are teal strips that are light which are reconstructed differently depending on the technique. TAA and FSR 2.2 seem to struggle a bit with creating a line that is clean generally there’s some aliasing and flicker right here due to the fact automobile moves forward.
DLSS 2.4 does a more satisfactory job providing us that line that is clean however this comes at the cost of ghosting, which is noticeable even using the Quality setting. None of these modes look ideal to be honest, we come to a section with overhead power lines and this is something that’s quite difficult to upscale properly, especially in fast motion though I tend to find ghosting very distracting, so Naturally prefer native TAA.
in the benchmark. Quality, local TAA seems the very best with all the cleanest outlines, but you can find obvious differences when considering DLSS and FSR.OnDLSS utilizing the* that is( mode sizzles a bit and doesn’t do an amazing job anti-aliasing the lines, at times there’s noticeable gaps in the wires that change with each frame, causing some flickering, plus there’s also very slight ghosting at times.
the FSR side, there’s less sizzling and no visible double image in any frame, but the finest wire details are often missing here, while DLSS would attempt to reconstruct them.SoFSR also had more issues when wires passed over foliage details in the background, with the foliage flickering more than on the DLSS side. I slightly prefer the FSR image as there’s less sizzling, but neither reconstruction technique is doing a job that is great my estimation set alongside the online game’s local TAA algorithm.
WhileI Also spotted some ghosting in the FSR 2.2 image, which is most apparent looking at other cars at moderate distances away, where there can be some trails following those motor cars at times which aren’t present in the DLSS image. Quality while DLSS didn’t handle that light that is initial really, FSR does not manage several of those modest distance vehicles well.Performance FSR looks pretty good in comparison to DLSS utilizing the* that is( modes, this is less true using the So modes. But of the issues we’ve just been discussing are amplified when the render resolution is lower. There’s on the DLSS side, the sizzling and artifacting with those power that is overhead tend to be much more obvious. This regarding the FSR side the algorithm struggles with good cable details as well as times you just never look at energy outlines after all.
plenty of dilemmas no matter what the technique that is upscaling but it’s clear that DLSS is doing a superior job of fine detail reconstruction when working with a lower render resolution. Quality was also the case with previous comparisons between DLSS and FSR 2, so the gap remains with this FSR that is new 2.2.YourA large amount of that which we’ve already been speaing frankly about here might be called nitpicking though due to the fact almost all the picture is quite comparable between DLSS and FSR, specially when utilizing the* that is( mode. Ramp
In player car, the road and other cars all look great and most of the time there is very little or no ghosting using either reconstruction technique, which is impressive given the motion that is fast all game play.But with There’s the scene that is next’s pretty difficult to spot the difference between FSR and DLSS, with minor aliasing differences between each image depending on where you look. Quality when we get to the ramp and jump section of this showcase event, FSR 2.2 noticeably struggles with the ramp’s geometry and texture pattern.
For significant flickering here that’s distracting which isn’t noticeable in the DLSS 2.4 reconstruction, both using the
We mode. I don’t think DLSS looks better than native, but it looks the most similar to TAA that is native hereForza Horizon a significantly better representation of picture high quality comparisons, read the HUB movie below:Quality need certainly to consider these periodic artefacts in games like In 5 considering that the almost all enough time, there is not just a great deal dividing DLSS and FSR utilizing the* that is( modes. Performance previous titles, FSR has had issues with sizzling, reconstructing grass elements and fine details. I think all of these certain places tend to be enhanced in this video game in comparison to the things I past saw with FSR 2.1 inside our XeSS evaluation, though this is certainly just one single subject and we also understand picture high quality can differ with your strategies according to the execution. DLSS seems exceptional right here, but AMD do be seemingly increasing each release to their tech.
In just a few lingering issues like the ramp we just saw where FSR 2.2 still requires some work, as well as the However mode which falls away relative to DLSS.Quality this next scene we’re looking at a drag race and when focusing on the rear demister lines I think FSR 2.2 does a better job than DLSS 2.4 at reconstructing those fine details on a semi-transparent object in motion, getting closer to TAA.
Focusing the majority of the image is honestly pretty similar like many of these scenes, when using the The mode.Meanwhile on the antenna array on the right side of each image, both DLSS and FSR really struggle with this element that is particular.
When DLSS picture has many sizzling and ghosting which can be very obvious in movement that practically blurs the details that are fine. Performance the FSR 2.2 presentation has flickering that is obvious only does not look since steady as local TAA. I do not have opinion that is strong on which technique does a better job as both need work. FSR is also slightly less stable when foliage that is reconstructing though this is certainly difficult to spot.Both taking a look at the Performance settings, DLSS 2.4 struggles much more aided by the back demister outlines, but features a obvious benefit with all the antenna range.
Dirt Track
The practices look quite crap trying to puzzle out what direction to go along with that details and I also would typically suggest staying away from the
While settings in this video game, but it, the FSR 2.2 presentation has more flickering, is blurrier and just can’t handle the fine details as well as DLSS for that element.(* if you do want to use) Most difference that is obvious this next scene is contrasting the total amount of confetti particle results between your TAA, DLSS and FSR presentations appropriate in the beginning.There FSR 2.2 seems quite comparable to TAA, both be seemingly rejecting some of those particles while DLSS is reconstructing all of them.
For tend to be needless to say some scene differences when considering each picture because of the nature that is random of particles, but DLSS consistently showed more particles so in that sense it is better than native for this effect.
Outside a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:The of this there’s nothing much else of note that we haven’t described in previous segments. Quality foliage, cars, ground detail, wires, water effects, fine mesh, and so on are all well constructed using both DLSS and FSR in fast motion when using the I’d mode and
It’s have a hard time telling which mode was being used when playing the game – outside of default sharpness differences, which are adjustable.Performance more obvious using the* that is( mode, where DLSS creates an even more steady picture, nonetheless it nonetheless does not get near to local TAA once the render quality is really reduced.We’re this next scene, a comparable items that we’ve been talking about.
considering a wilderness scene additionally the nitpick that is only had was slightly more ghosting on the FSR 2.2 side during one brief part of the race, which was only noticeable when slowing down the footage.
InAMD does claim ghosting has been “alleviated” for fast moving objects, which based on this and the earlier example isn’t fully true from a sense that is technical if you’ll be challenged to really spot this specific issue whenever gaming…with one exclusion and that is transparent cars.Forza Horizon some chapters of
, when you are finishing jobs like drift areas, traffic becomes semi-transparent, through them and not affect your run so you can drive. DLSS does a job that is good of these vehicles without any significant dilemmas, it appears to be the manner in which you’d anticipate it to appear.WeFSR 2.2 having said that programs plenty of ghosting and odd items.
don’t believe the algorithm is able to manage something such as this, together with outcome is very bad, also utilizing the best quality mode at 4K.Image Quality
Taking1440p Quality a fast glance at 1440p picture high quality, it is the exact same tale much like 4K, however with all items we have discussed earlier increased, also utilizing the
So mode.If in the event that FSR 2.2 picture flickers a little bit at 4K, it will probably flicker much more at 1440p. As the DLSS picture has many sizzling on good cables at 4K, it will sizzle much more at 1440p.
For anticipated, the low the render quality goes, the greater trouble these formulas have actually at reconstructing.
Generally a significantly better representation of picture high quality comparisons, read the HUB movie below:
This talking, we do not believe FSR 2.2 is really as competitive up against DLSS 2.4 at 1440p or any rendering through a almost or render that is sub-1080p.We hasn’t changed compared to our previous investigations of DLSS vs FSR, where generally DLSS gets the lead at 1440p. Quality don’t think FSR 2.2 looks terrible at 1440p using the* that is( mode, but we mightnot need to get any less than that in an easy movement online game such as
5.QualityI probably would not suggest utilizing DLSS lower than But either, and realistically in this kind of online game the local TAA does look quite a bit better at 1440p than upscaling.
Performance
When for people who require the overall performance it may be an option.
We considering overall performance, DLSS and FSR overall performance is comparable, with DLSS tending to really have a edge that is slight higher quality modes.Using had to swap the RTX out 4080 for the RTX 3080 right here of these benchmarks, due to the fact RTX 4080 went right into a Central Processing Unit bottleneck practically instantly into the integral standard when making use of a number of the reduced high quality upscaling settings despite having maximum options.
We an RTX 3080 much more appropriately shows the variations right here, through a performance that is modest in this title using upscaling.Performance don’t think it’s worth using the* that is( mode from either strategy also at 4K, as it does not give a significant uplift to overall performance when compared to
Then mode and presents many aesthetic dilemmas.
At at reduced resolutions like 1440p, DLSS and FSR tend to be also less efficient than at 4K – where formerly we had been making your way around a 15 to 20 per cent overall performance gain, we are today down at below 10%.
What We Learned
Overall 1080p it is also not too efficient, and also this isn’t CPU bottlenecked, 1080p overall performance is exceptional to 1440p and 4K, additionally the online game was demonstrably GPU restricted according to in-game metrics, it is simply that upscaling is very worthless at 1080p while the online game’s overall performance does not appear as associated with quality as various other games tend to be.
The it’s already been interesting to evaluate FSR 2.2 but eventually it offersn’t relocated the needle substantially with regards to which upscaling strategy is the better. FSR 2.2 seemingly have enhanced a number of the problems with repair we described within our look that is previous alongside, but the gaps relative to DLSS remain in a lot of cases, especially when rendering at lower resolutions.Quality good news is that the FSR 2.2 image quality at 4K using the* that is( mode is impressive, with all the almost all the picture searching very comparable to DLSS 2.4’s
At mode and local TAA rendering.While times, FSR does a more satisfactory job of reconstructing elements than DLSS, though frequently the reason being the kind of artifact for the reason that scenario is less obvious than DLSS’. Forza Horizon my inclination in
There 5 is utilizing rendering that is native TAA – which is the most stable and least aliased in general across a variety of conditions – using FSR 2.2 is quite acceptable. I also liked that all techniques have adjustable sharpening sliders, which is a must for upscaling.Both Were occasions that are several we was not impressed with either FSR or DLSS in this video game to be truthful. Both practices can create ghosting that is noticeable times, despite AMD’s claims for FSR 2.2.
Shimmering upscaling techniques show a lot of artifacts reconstructing fine details in motion, common on overhead wires and similarly small or thin elements.In, Flickering, sizzling, aliasing is pretty common and obvious using even the quality modes that are highest, it only depends where and when the thing is all of them, which could vary between each strategy. Nvidia these kinds of quick games with a lot of movement, we believe both AMD and
The have approach to take to make images that are clean all conditions.The main issues with FSR 2.2 come down to two areas.
The first is that while both techniques do struggle in some areas, FSR 2.2 has more edge cases of poor reconstruction, like the ramp and transparent cars we showed – even using the highest quality modes. I think these edge cases have been reduced with the revision that is new but there is nonetheless a lot more of all of them than video gaming with DLSS 2.4, and even though I happened to be barely impressed with exactly how DLSS viewed times.Performance 2nd is FSR 2.2 has not solved the space between DLSS and FSR at reduced render resolutions, like utilizing the* that is( mode or gaming at 1440p. Performance lower render resolutions increases the amount of artifacts with both methods that are upscaling but FSR suffers a weightier hit making picture high quality relatively even worse. DLSS continues to have a lead that is clear the With mode at 4K, and most modes at 1440p. Forza Horizon that said,
5 is not a example that is good reasonable render quality upscaling, since the online game can be so quickly you will see loads of items.But NvidiaAMD is performing a great task of contending with DLSS while the level of games that support FSR 2 these days is pretty reasonable great deal of thought premiered just a few months ago. Nvidia has actually proceeded to enhance DLSS 2 through the years too, therefore to shut these spaces we have been speaking about, AMD needs to outpace Whether in supplying improvements. I’d they are able to accomplish that remains to be noticed, because right now Nvidia nevertheless say DLSS is really a selling point for
Shopping Shortcuts GPUs due to its quality that is superior and online game help.
:(*)
